Duke of Westminster
"The neoclassical economists' view of
their proper role is rather like that in The Realtor's
Oath, which includes a vow 'To protect the
individual right of real estate ownership. ' The word 'individual ' is
construed broadly to include corporations, estates,
trusts, anonymous offshore funds, schools, government
agencies, institutions, partnerships, cooperatives, the
Duke of Westminster, the Sultan of Brunei, the Medellin
Cartel, Saddam Hussein, congregations, Archbishops,
families (including criminal families) and so on, but
'individual ' sounds more
all-American and subsumes them all. This is a potent
chant that stirs people to extremes of self-righteousness
and siege mentality when challenged." - Mason
Gaffney in Economics in Support of
Environmentalism
Mason Gaffney: Who Owns Southern
California (1997)
Non-resident aliens own about 75% of the "major"
buildings in the L.A. CBD west of Broadway [L.A. Times 21
Sept 86].
Charles Grosvenor, an
Englishman, a.k.a. The Duke of
Westminster, is one of these is. Grosvenor owns
half the Wells Fargo Building on a valuable site in
downtown L.A. Grosvenor also holds 17 acres
in Silicon Valley. He also holds Annacis Island, 1200
acres near Vancouver, B.C. He is a major owner in
downtown Melbourne. He is diversified around the world.
These are parts of his overseas holdings. Their value was
estimated in 1985 at $1.3 billion, but they were not for
sale and the basis for the valuation is not given. Like
city land worldwide, they must have doubled in price,
1985-89 — and then dropped again.
The core of Grosvenor's holdings is 300 acres in central
London, including half the Mayfair District, most of
Belgravia, and Grosvenor Square where the U.S. Embassy is
one of his many lessees. His country estate is 4500
acres. Grosvenor, along with Earl Cadogan, the Duke of
Bedford, Viscount Portman, and Lord Howard de Walden,
pretty well control London land. [L.A. Times, 9/85]
Dave Wetzel: Who Should Get the Land
Rent?
Transport for London does not own all of the coach
station. One third of the land and the old in-bound coach
shed is owned by "Grosvenor Estates."
We pay them £230,000 per annum for the use of
their land.
But where do we get the money from?
We charge the coach companies a fee for every coach
that comes into the coach station and a part of that goes
to our landlord.
Where do they get the money from?
They get the money from their ticket prices.
So every poor traveller is contributing towards the
£230,000 given to Grosvenor Estates, which is owned
by the Duke of Westminster. (His family name was
"Grosvenor" until Queen Victoria elevated one "Hugh
Grosvenor" to the peerage in 1874.) They have owned most
of Mayfair, Belgravia and parts of Victoria for hundreds
of years.
So, we have the absurdity, . . . . . . . . nay the
obscenity!, of the poorest travellers in the country,
subsidising the third richest man in the country, to the
tune of £230,000 per annum!
Surely, the value of this land only arises because
people live and work in our great city?
So surely it is all the people that should benefit
from land wealth?
We SHOULD pay rent for the land.
All of the land.
But not to the rich Duke, but to the
Government, so that they can use this natural wealth to
pay for schools and hospitals etc.
And not from this one site, but from all the land in
the country.
AND if there is any wealth left over — and I'm
sure there would be — the Government could return
it to all of us in the form of a land dividend. ...
read the
whole passage
Karl Williams: Landlording It Over
Us
Britains' wealthiest man gets rich the easy way -- he
has his underlings collect and bank his rent. And if the
rents from his vast land holdings weren’t enough,
soaring property prices have escalated his net worth sky
high – to be exact, UK£11.5 billion. To give
him his full title, he is His Grace,
Gerald Grosvenor, OBE, Sixth
Duke of Westminster.
Forget the vast tracts of rural land, including a
100,000-acre estate in Scotland which contains no less
than three mountains. The 300 acres the duke owns in central London,
comprising Mayfair and Belgravia, are today one of the
most valuable patches of ground on the
planet.
It was a handy marriage which brought this fortune into
the Grosvenor family’s hands – in 1677, Sir
Richard Grosvenor married Mary Davies, heir to the
hundred acres north of Piccadilly and the “Five
Fields” south of Knightsbridge. During the 18th and
19th centuries, Mayfair and Belgravia were built up as
residential areas for London’s wealthy classes, a
position they have occupied ever since. Unlike many other
great landowners who have cashed in, the Grosvenors held
on and have benefited enormously from the latest boom in
London property prices.
The duke has nowadays diversified his land portfolio. His
commercial property company, Grosvenor, has become a
serious player, with a vast array of investments and
developments around the world. These include office
blocks in San Francisco,
business parks in Vancouver,
luxury apartments in Hong Kong
and shopping centres in Spain
and Portugal. In the UK,
Grosvenor has developed Festival Place shopping centre in
Basingstoke and is set to undertake a £700m.
mixed-use redevelopment in the centre of Liverpool. Back
in his tract of Mayfair, land values are in the
stratosphere: in 2001, BP’s pension fund sold
ten acres of Mayfair for a cool
£335m.
Is it any wonder that, given how there is little or no
land value taxation, the duke has all his many eggs in
the land investment basket? But it’s not just for
economic considerations that he could never contemplate
selling his vast acreage, for he has a philosophical
reason for not selling. (Have a bucket ready before
reading the following!) “This is
part of my heritage, my birthright. It is not to do with
anything materialistic, but is deeply
ingrained.”
Henry George: The Land
Question
Think of these enormous wastes, and of the others
which, like these, are due to the fundamental wrong which
produces an unjust distribution of wealth and distorts
the natural development of society, and you will begin to
see what a higher, purer, richer civilization would be
made possible by the simple measure that will assert
natural rights. You will begin to see how, even if no one
but the present landholders were to be considered, this
would be the greatest boon that could be vouchsafed them
by society, and that, for them to fight it, would be as
if the dog with a tin kettle tied to his tail should snap
at the hand that offered to free him. Even the greatest
landholder! As for such landholders as our working
farmers and homestead-owners, the slightest discussion
would show them that they had everything to gain by the
change. But even such landholders as the Duke of
Westminster and the Astors would be gainers.
|
To share this page with a friend:
right click, choose "send," and add your
comments.
|
|
Red links have not been
visited; .
Green links are pages you've seen
|
Essential Documents pertinent
to this theme:
essential_documents
|
|