1
2
3
Wealth and Want | |||||||
... because democracy alone is not enough to produce widely shared prosperity. | |||||||
Home | Essential Documents | Themes | All Documents | Authors | Glossary | Links | Contact Us |
Henry George: The Crime of Poverty (1885 speech)
If poverty is appointed by the power which is
above us all, then it is no crime; but if poverty is
unnecessary, then it is a crime for which society is
responsible and for which society must suffer. I hold,
and I think no one who looks at the facts can fail to
see, that poverty is utterly unnecessary. It is not by
the decree of the Almighty, but it is because of our own
injustice, our own selfishness, our own ignorance, that
this scourge, worse than any pestilence, ravages our
civilisation, bringing want and suffering and
degradation, destroying souls as well as bodies. Look
over the world, in this heyday of nineteenth century
civilisation. In every civilised country under the sun
you will find men and women whose condition is worse than
that of the savage: men and women and little children
with whom the veriest savage could not afford to
exchange. Even in this new city of yours with virgin soil
around you, you have had this winter to institute a
relief society. Your roads have been filled with tramps,
fifteen, I am told, at one time taking shelter in a
round-house here. As here, so everywhere; and poverty is
deepest where wealth most abounds.
What more unnatural than this? There is nothing in nature like this poverty which today curses us. We see rapine in nature; we see one species destroying another; but as a general thing animals do not feed on their own kind; and, wherever we see one kind enjoying plenty, all creatures of that kind share it. No man, I think, ever saw a herd of buffalo, of which a few were fat and the great majority lean. No man ever saw a flock of birds, of which two or three were swimming in grease and the others all skin and bone. Nor in savage life is there anything like the poverty that festers in our civilisation. In a rude state of society there are seasons of want, seasons when people starve; but they are seasons when the earth has refused to yield her increase, when the rain has not fallen from the heavens, or when the land has been swept by some foe – not when there is plenty. And yet the peculiar characteristic of this modern poverty of ours is that it is deepest where wealth most abounds. Why, today, while over the civilised world there is so much distress, so much want, what is the cry that goes up? What is the current explanation of the hard times? Overproduction! There are so many clothes that men must go ragged, so much coal that in the bitter winters people have to shiver, such over-filled granaries that people actually die by starvation! Want due to over-production! Was a greater absurdity ever uttered? How can there be over-production till all have enough? It is not over-production; it is unjust distribution. ... We talk about over-production. How can there be such a thing as over-production while people want? All these things that are said to be over-produced are desired by many people. Why do they not get them? They do not get them because they have not the means to buy them; not that they do not want them. Why have not they the means to buy them? They earn too little. When the great masses of men have to work for an average of $1.40 a day, it is no wonder that great quantities of goods cannot be sold.
Now why is it that men have to work for such low
wages? Because if they were to demand higher wages there
are plenty of unemployed men ready to step into their
places. It is this mass of unemployed men who compel that
fierce competition that drives wages down to the point of
bare subsistence. Why is it that there are men who cannot
get employment? Did you ever think what a strange thing
it is that men cannot find employment? Adam had no
difficulty in finding employment; neither had Robinson
Crusoe; the finding of employment was the last thing that
troubled them.
If men cannot find an employer, why cannot they employ themselves? Simply because they are shut out from the element on which human labour can alone be exerted. Men are compelled to compete with each other for the wages of an employer, because they have been robbed of the natural opportunities of employing themselves; because they cannot find a piece of God's world on which to work without paving some other human creature for the privilege. ...
In the Old Testament we are told that when
the Israelites journeyed through the desert, they were
hungered, and that God sent manna down out of the
heavens. There was enough for all of them, and they all
took it and were relieved. But supposing that desert had
been held as private property, as the soil of Great
Britain is held, as the soil even of our new States is
being held; suppose that one of the Israelites had a
square mile, and another one had twenty square miles, and
another one had a hundred square miles, and the great
majority of the Israelites did not have enough to set the
soles of their feet upon, which they could call their own
— what would become of the manna? What
good would it have done to the majority? Not a whit.
Though God had sent down manna enough for all, that manna
would have been the property of the landholders; they
would have employed some of she others perhaps, to gather
it up into heaps for them, and would have sold it to
their hungry brethren. Consider it; this purchase and
sale of manna might have gone on until the majority of
Israelites had given all they had, even to the clothes
off their backs. What then? Then they would not have had
anything left to buy manna with, and the consequences
would have been that while they went hungry the manna
would have lain in great heaps, and the landowners would
have been complaining of the over-production of manna.
There would have been a great harvest of manna and hungry
people, just precisely the phenomenon that we see today.
...
Now go into the cities and what do you see! Why, you see even a lower depth of poverty; aye, if I would point out the worst of the evils of land monopoly I would not take you to Connemara; I would not take you to Skye or Kintire — I would take you to Dublin or Glasgow or London. There is something worse than physical deprivation, something worse than starvation; and that is the degradation of the mind, the death of the soul. That is what you will find in those cities. Now, what is the cause of that? Why, it is plainly to be seen; the people driven off the land in the country are driven into the slums of the cities. For every man that is driven off the land the demand for the produce of the workmen of the cities is lessened; and the man himself with his wife and children, is forced among those workmen to compete upon any terms for a bare living and force wages down. Get work he must or starve — get work he must or do that which those people, so long as they maintain their manly feelings, dread more than death, go to the alms-houses. That is the reason, here as in Great Britain, that the cities are overcrowded. Open the land that is locked up, that is held by dogs in the manger, who will not use it themselves and will not allow anybody else to use it, and you would see no more of tramps and hear no more of over-production. ... read the whole speech Henry George: Ode to Liberty (1877 speech)
In the very centers of our civilization today are
want and suffering enough to make sick at heart whoever
does not close his eyes and steel his nerves. Dare we
turn to the Creator and ask Him to relieve it? Supposing
the prayer were heard, and at the behest with which the
universe sprang into being there should glow in the sun a
greater power; new virtue fill the air; fresh vigor the
soil; that for every blade of grass that now grows two
should spring up, and the seed that now increases
fifty-fold should increase a hundredfold! Would poverty
be abated or want relieved? Manifestly no! Whatever
benefit would accrue would be but temporary. The new
powers streaming through the material universe could be
utilized only through land. And land, being private
property, the classes that now monopolize the bounty of
the Creator would monopolize all the new bounty. Land
owners would alone be benefited. Rents would increase,
but wages would still tend to the starvation point! ...
read
the whole speech and also
Significant Paragraphs from Henry George's
Progress & Poverty: 14
Liberty, and Equality of Opportunity (in the
unabridged P&P:
Part X: The Law of Human Progress — Chapter 5: The
Central Truth)
Henry George: The Condition of Labor — An Open Letter to Pope Leo XIII in response to Rerum Novarum (1891)
Louis Post: Outlines of Louis F. Post's Lectures, with Illustrative Notes and Charts (1894) — Appendix: FAQ
|
|
to email this page to a friend: right click, choose
"send"
|
||||||
Wealth and Want
|
www.wealthandwant.com
|
|||||
... because democracy alone hasn't yet led to a society
in which all can prosper
|