Frank Chodorov
Dan Sullivan: Are
you a Real Libertarian, or a ROYAL Libertarian?
The red, red herring
Royal libertarians are fond of confusing the
classical liberal concept of common land ownership,
particularly as espoused by land value tax advocate Henry
George, with socialism. Yet socialists have always been
contemptuous of George and of the distinction between
land monopoly and capital monopolies. However, Frank
Chodorov and Albert J. Nock (the original editors of
The Freeman) were both advocates of George's
economic remedies as well as lovers of individual
liberty.
The only reformer abroad in the world in my
time who interested me in the least was Henry George,
because his project did not contemplate prescription,
but, on the contrary, would reduce it to almost zero. He
was the only one of the lot who believed in freedom, or
(as far as I could see) had any approximation to an
intelligent idea of what freedom is, and of the economic
prerequisites to attaining it....One is immensely tickled
to see how things are coming out nowadays with reference
to his doctrine, for George was in fact the best
friend the capitalist ever had. He built up the
most complete and most impregnable defense of the rights
of capital that was ever constructed, and if the
capitalists of his day had had sense enough to dig in
behind it, their successors would not now be squirming
under the merciless exactions which collectivism is
laying on them, and which George would have no scruples
whatever about describing as sheer highwaymanry.
—Albert J. Nock "Thoughts on Utopia" ...
Read
the whole piece
Fred E. Foldvary — The Ultimate Tax Reform: Public
Revenue from Land Rent
Frank Chodorov, a fervent individualist and founding
editor of The Freeman, published by the Foundation for
Economic Education and still a leading libertarian
journal of ideas, became in 1937 director of the Henry
George School of Social Science in New York City, serving
until 1942. Like most followers of Henry George, Chodorov
regarded a charge on land value as not a true tax, which
arbitrarily extracts wealth, but a “payment for the
use of a location, determined by the higgling and
haggling of the market, and it makes no difference to the
land user whether he pays rent to the city fathers or to
a private owner.”26 Explaining the value of a
location derives to a great extent from community
services, rather than the efforts of the landowner as
such, Chodorov noted “it would seem logical that
this value—which we call land rent—should go
to defray the expenses of these common services." ...
read the whole
document
|
To share this page with a friend:
right click, choose "send," and add your
comments.
|
|
Red links have not been
visited; .
Green links are pages you've seen
|
Essential Documents pertinent
to this theme:
|
|