Thomas Shearman
a founding partner of the law firm Shearman and
Sterling,
Louis Post: Outlines of Louis F. Post's
Lectures, with Illustrative Notes and Charts (1894)
Note 2: In "Progress and Poverty," book viii,
ch. iv, Henry George speaks of "the effect of
substituting for the manifold taxes now imposed, a single
tax on the value of land"; but the term did not become a
distinctive name until 1888.
The first general movement along the lines of
"Progress and Poverty" began New York City
election of 1886, when Henry George polled 68,110 votes
as an independent candidate for mayor, and was defeated
by the Democratic candidate, Abram S. Hewitt, by a
plurality of only 22,442, the Republican, Theodore
Roosevelt, polling but 60,435. Following that election
the United Labor Party was formed, the Syracuse
Convention in August, 1887, by the exclusion of the
Socialists, came to present the central idea of
"Progress and Poverty" as distinguished from the
Socialistic propaganda which until then was identified
with it. Coincident with the organization of the United
Labor Party the Anti-Poverty Society was formed; and the
two bodies, one representing the political and the other
the religious phase of the idea, worked together until
President Cleveland's tariff message of 1887 appeared. In
this message Mr. George saw the timid beginnings of that
open struggle between protection and free trade to which
he had for years looked forward as the political movement
that must culminate in the abolition of all taxes save
those upon land values, and he responded at once to the
sentiments of the message. But many protectionists, who
had followed him because they supposed he was a land
nationalizer, now broke away from his leadership, and the
United Labor Party and the Anti-Poverty Society were soon
practically dissolved. Those who understood Mr. George's
real position regarding the land question readily
acquiesced in his views as to political policy, and a
considerable movement resulted, which, however, for some
time lacked an identifying name. This was the situation
when Thomas G. Shearman, Esq., wrote for
the Standard an article on taxation in which he
illustrated and advocated the land value tax as a fiscal
measure. The article had been submitted without a
caption, and Mr. George, then the editor of the
Standard, entitled it "The Single Tax." This
title was at once adopted by the "George men," as they
were often called, and has ever since served as the name
of the movement it describes. ...
To retain Rent for common use it is not necessary to
abolish land-titles, nor to let land out to the highest
bidder, nor to invent some new mechanism of taxation, nor
in any other way to directly change existing modes of
holding land for use, or existing machinery for
collecting public revenues. "Great changes can be best
brought about under old forms."109 Let land be held
nominally as it is now. Let taxes be collected by the
same kind of machinery as now. But abolish all taxes
except those that fall upon actual and potential Rent,
that is to say, upon land values.
110. Thomas G. Shearman, Esq., of
New York, author of the famous magazine
article on "Who Owns the United States," estimates that
sixty-five per cent of the present annual value of the
land in the United States would pay all the present
expenses of American government — federal, state,
county, and municipal.
Q2. Would the single tax yield revenue sufficient for
all kinds of government?
A. Thomas G. Shearman, Esq., of New
York, estimates that sixty-five per cent of the rent that
the land in the United States now yields actually and
potentially to its owners, would be sufficient. But
whether it would or not is as yet an unimportant
question. If all revenues ought to be raised from land
values, then no revenues should be drawn from other
sources while any land value remains in private
possession. Until land values are exhausted the taxation
of labor cannot be excused. ... read the book
Charles B. Fillebrown: A Catechism of
Natural Taxation, from Principles of Natural
Taxation (1917)
Q57. Would the single tax yield sufficient revenue
for all government purposes, local, state, and
national?
A. Careful estimates by Mr. Thomas G. Shearman indicate
that all present taxes amount to not much more than one
half of the annual site value of the land. But he
said:
The honest needs of public government grow faster
than population and fully as fast as wealth itself.
Local taxation will increase rapidly; and it ought to
do so..... This does not imply that ground rent will
not be sufficient to supply many, possibly all, of
those additions to human happiness which Henry George
has pictured in such glowing words. But such extensions
of the sphere of government must take place gradually;
or they will be ruinous failures, simply because the
state cannot at once furnish the necessary machinery
for their successful operation. ... read the whole
article
|
To share this page with a friend:
right click, choose "send," and add your
comments.
|
related
themes:
see_also
|
Red links have not been
visited; .
Green links are pages you've seen
|
Essential Documents pertinent
to this theme:
essential_documents
|
|