1
2
3
Wealth and Want | |||||||
... because democracy alone is not enough to produce widely shared prosperity. | |||||||
Home | Essential Documents | Themes | All Documents | Authors | Glossary | Links | Contact Us |
Utilities
Mason Gaffney: Full Employment,
Growth And Progress On A Small Planet: Relieving Poverty
While Healing The Earth
7. Value of urbanism. Cities are the cores
of specialization and exchange, which in turn are the
mainsprings of productivity and technical progress.
Urban land is therefore highly
productive, so that most land values are found in cities.
So are most of the best jobs, and investment
outlets.
Cities are the site of most “downstream” production, which uses more labor per unit of natural resources than the primary production outside cities. Modern “ecological footprint” thinking seems to deny or overlook this important fact. Cities earn their keep by providing the rest of the world with manufactures, medical care, education, research, and many other urban products and services that enhance rural output and welfare. (Even the Sierra Club and Audubon Society have downtown urban headquarters.) 8. Open space. Lands with open access (e.g. parks, and public rights-of-way) are already common property, and should not be taxed. Land taxes are needed only to compensate the landless for tenure – the right to exclude others – that society grants to the landed in preference to the landless. Common carriers, with rates regulated to reasonable levels, would seem to be a form of open access.In practise, the last point means that public utilities should be rate-regulated, instead of being taxed and then allowed to shift the taxes forward to customers. 9. Natural monopolies. Natural monopolies (a term going back to George’s harbinger, J.S. Mill) should be publicly owned, or regulated. Georgism as a political movement was closely allied with movements to lower urban mass transit fares and improve service, using if necessary the property tax base to cover deficits ... read the whole article Mason Gaffney: Oil and Gas Leasing: a Study in Pseudo-Socialism
"Socialism," in common usage, is a Protean word,
slippery and shifting. Many use it without defining it,
whether from innocence, negligence, or cunning. These
many include not just the vulgar, but most economists:
semantic care is weak in the traditions of the
profession. "Rigorous" model-builders today are among the
offenders: the premium is on gilding the superstructure,
neglecting the foundation. Indeed, foundations are not
even needed for models that float in outer space,
vouching for and communing mainly with each
other. Those who do define Socialism,
explicitly or implicitly, use the word for different
things. A major difference, treated here, is between
Managerial Socialism (who decides) and Distributive
Socialism (who gets).
These may overlap, but are independent of each other and
often conflict. For example, Riverside,
CA, owns its own electric utility (on whose Board
I sit, losing battles). This is Managerial Socialism,
municipal style. Its traditional rate structure includes
large elements of cross-subsidy, mainly
taking from the lower middles for the rich, tempered by
crumbs thrown to the very poor. The same is true
of our water system, and of most municipally owned and
managed utilities around the nation. Water and sewer service are common examples of
Managerial Socialism (from which the mnemonic "sewer
socialism"). They have little in common with Distributive
Socialism.... Read the whole
article
Charles B. Fillebrown: A Catechism of Natural Taxation, from Principles of Natural Taxation (1917)
|
|
to email this page to a friend: right click, choose
"send"
|
||||||
Wealth and Want
|
www.wealthandwant.com
|
|||||
... because democracy alone hasn't yet led to a society
in which all can prosper
|