We say that all the social difficulties we see
here, all the social difficulties that exist in England
or Scotland, all the social difficulties that are growing
up in the United States--
- the lowness of wages,
- the scarcity of employment,
- the fact that though labor is the producer of
wealth, yet everywhere the laboring class is the poor
class
--are all due to one great primary wrong, that
wrong which makes the natural element necessary to all,
the natural element that was made by the Creator for the
use of all, the property of some of the people, that
great wrong that in every civilized country disinherited
the mass of men of the bounty of their Creator. What we
aim at is not the increase in the number of a privileged
class, not making some thousands of earth owners into
some more thousands. No, no; what we aim at is to secure
the natural and God-given right to the humblest in the
community--to secure to every child born in Ireland, or
in any other country, his natural right to the equal use
of his native land. Read the whole speech
Jeff Smith: Giving Life to the Property Tax
Shift (PTS)
John Muir is right. "Tug on any one thing and
find it connected to everything else in the
universe." Tug on the property tax and find it
connected to urban slums, farmland loss, political
favoritism, and unearned equity with disrupted
neighborhood tenure. Echoing Thoreau, the more familiar
reforms have failed to address this many-headed hydra at
its root. To think that the root could be chopped by a
mere shift in the property tax base -- from buildings to
land -- must seem like the epitome of unfounded faith.
Yet the evidence shows that state and local tax activists
do have a powerful, if subtle, tool at their disposal.
The "stick" spurring efficient use of land is a higher
tax rate upon land, up to even the site's full annual
value. The "carrot" rewarding efficient use of land is a
lower or zero tax rate upon improvements.
Economic Problems to Solve
Taxing built-value penalizes construction and
maintenance of buildings. This deadweight loss on the
local economy constrains housing supply and raises land
values, driving speculation. Fewer people can then own
parcels for homes and businesses, and debt levels
increase.
Environmental Problems to Solve
Rus (rural regions) provide
resources as urbs (cities) provide services. Yet
neither does so efficiently now. Allowed by a present
property tax that takes aim at buildings while treading
lightly on sites, owners of sites and resources both
overextract and withhold appropriate land from use,
speculating on a higher future return. Vacant and
underused sites waste on the average about 22 percent of
city surface. Using land less than optimally means more
land must be used. Clark County, Washington, combines the
empty storefronts, vacant lots, run-down buildings in
Vancouver, the county seat, with one of the fastest
growth rates in the nation. The inflated prices are
hardly affordable by governments intending to purchase
open space; hence parks are smaller and fewer.
Political Problems to Solve To
manage growth, counties adopt boundaries and other
restraints -- which are neither effective nor politically
stable. The once "green" Oregon legislature, for
instance, in '95 and '97 (controlled by Republicans)
passed over ten bills to drastically weaken
long-established land use laws. Also under siege is the
property tax, formerly the largest source of public
revenue in the US (back when the federal and state
governments were much smaller). Voters in many states
have passed caps and rate reductions, spurring a search
for alternative revenue sources.
Equity Problems to Solve America is rapidly turning
back the clock; we are on the path to becoming a
two-class society struggling on a ravaged planet. For the
first time since European settlers carved out their own
country, tenants outnumber owners. Farm workers outnumber
farm owners. Growers under dictatorial contracts to food
processors outnumber farmers still calling their own
shots. Tenants, as in Portland, Oregon, outnumber
homeowners. That gulf widens dramatically when defining
owners as those not under a mortgage. In communities of
rapid turnover, crime invades along with government
corruption.
Previous Reform Attempts that Failed
To bolster
their local economies and fatten their tax base, local
governments compete to attract large new employers.
Hoping to recoup down the road when businesses pay full
property taxes, elected officials offer such inducements
as five-year abatements and low system development
charges. Yet each locality must outdo others' incentives.
Enterprise zones and tax privileges amount to major
subsidies that would otherwise generate substantial tax
revenues.
Already, Washington, Oregon, and other states employ a
nonregulatory means to reward preservation of
unbuilt-upon land. They assess farm and resource lands at
current use rather than at market value to avoid
pressuring owners to develop. However, as long as demand
for land persists, and the more central locations are not
offered in the market, then the temptation before farmers
to sell out to developers also persists.
Our Different Idea To send a clear message to
new businesses that their growth will not be
unnecessarily impeded, government can permanently shift
taxes off sales, income, and buildings and onto land.
Since taxing land lowers its cost, business could pay
this greater land tax from what otherwise would be spent
on purchasing land. This higher land levy would remain
affordable as long as owners use their land
efficiently.
Developers argue that abundant land lowers its price and
thus the property tax burden. While true, newly-available
land need not be current open space. Without baring the
countryside to new development, both land price and the
property tax can be lowered. The price of land drops when
the tax rate on land is raised. And yet this higher rate,
if coupled with a lower or absent rate on buildings, does
not swell the property tax burden of most residents.
Indeed, this property tax shift
(PTS) is progressive, providing relief for most
residents. And by taxing land, society impels owners who
had been speculatively withholding or underutilizing
theirs to develop or offer their parcels for development.
Hence the newly-available land comes from recycled sites,
not from open space.
The PTS not only lowers the price of land, it also lowers
the cost of buildings. Untaxing structures, besides
reducing their cost, also augments their supply. More
buildings means lower prices and rents. As the prices of
both buildings and land drop, more people are able to
purchase a home, apartment, or condominium.
Ethically, the PTS simplifies the revenue system, leaving
fewer decisions to be made by politicians in favor of
their backers. All the essential facts are open to public
scrutiny: the land's owner, value, use, and levy. And
since mere speculation would no longer be profitable,
owners would have less monetary motive to try to unduly
influence the political process. ... read the whole
article
|
To share this page with a friend:
right click, choose "send," and add your
comments.
|
|
Red links have not been
visited; .
Green links are pages you've seen
|
Essential Documents pertinent
to this theme:
|
|