Henry George — A
Perplexed Philosopher
Part III—Recantation
(continued)
Chapter XIII — Principal
Brown
REALLY, this final close of the most important
discussion of the most important book of the most important
grand division of the great Spencerian Synthetic Philosophy
can only be fitly treated by calling on the imagination for
an illustration:
Mr. J. D. Brown, for some time before our civil war a
prominent citizen of Vicksburg, Miss., was a native of
Connecticut, of Puritan stock and thrifty habits. Beginning
life as a clock-maker, he emigrated when a young man to
that part of Ohio, settled from New England, which is still
in those regions known as the Western Reserve. There he
went to school-teaching, joined a local literary society,
and made some speeches which were highly applauded, and in
which he did not hesitate to denounce slavery as the sum of
all villainies, and to declare for immediate, unconditional
emancipation. Somewhat later on, he went South and settled
at Vicksburg, where he became professor of moral philosophy
in a young ladies' seminary, and, finally, its principal.
Being prudent in speaking of the peculiar institution, and
gaining a reputation for profundity, he became popular in
the best society, a favorite guest in the lavish
hospitalities of the wealthier planters, and, in the
Southern manner, was always spoken of to visitors with
pride as "Principal Brown, one of our most distinguished
men, sir! a great educator, and a great authority on moral
philosophy, sir!"
The slavery question was in the meantime growing hotter
and hotter. There were no abolitionists in Vicksburg or in
the country about, for any one suspected of abolitionism
was promptly lynched, or sent North in a coat of tar and
feathers. But slaves were occasionally disappearing, among
them some of especial value as mechanics; and even a very
valuable yellow girl, whose beauty and accomplishments were
such that her owner had refused $5,000 for her, had been
spirited off by the underground railroad. And "society" in
Vicksburg was becoming more and more excited. Though no one
yet dreamed that it was destined ere long to redden the
Mississippi, and light the skies of Vicksburg with bursting
bombs, the cloud on the northern horizon was visibly
swelling and darkening, and in "bleeding Kansas" a
guerrilla war had already crimsoned the grass.
Still, the lines of Principal Brown were cast in
pleasant places, and he received the hon ours due to a
great philosopher, deemed all the greater by those who in
their secret hearts did not find his moral philosophy quite
intelligible; for he not only made a practice of using the
longest words and of interlarding his discourses with
references to people of whom his auditors had never heard,
and of whom he could say anything he pleased, but he had
taken Balzac's hint, and every now and again he strung
together a series of words that sounded as though they
might mean something, but really had no meaning at all. He
had thus gained a reputation for great profundity with
those who vainly puzzled over them, and who attributed
their difficulty to an ignorance they were ashamed to
admit.
But one woeful day there came to Vicksburg some echo of
one of his debating-club speeches in the Western Reserve,
and some of the leading citizens deemed fit to interrogate
him. He had to lie a little, but succeeded in quieting
them; and as not much was said about the matter, his
standing in Vicksburg society was, in general
unchanged.
Following this, however, something worse happened. The
Rev. Dr. Sorely, one of the most eloquent divines of the
Methodist Church South, made a trip to Ohio, and in the
Western Reserve delivered a lecture on the biblical and
patriarchal system of labor as practiced by our Southern
brethren. Among the auditors was a man who remembered and
quoted some of the eloquent utterances, on the other side,
of the reverend doctor's friend, Principal Brown. The
matter might have passed unheeded, but that the Vicksburg
Thunderbolt, anticipating much glory to the South
from the Northern visit of its eloquent defender, had sent
a special correspondent with him; and a report of the
lecture, including the reference to Principal Brown, duly
appeared in its columns.
This was indeed a serious matter, and the Principal
wrote immediately to the Thunderbolt with feeling
and vehemence. He said that he feared that if he remained
silent many would think he had said things he had not said;
intimated that he had never been in Ohio, and what he had
said when he was there he had said for the purpose of
finding a secure basis for slavery; that he had only been
talking of transcendental ethics, and not of sublunary
ethics at all; that he had always insisted that the
slave-owners of the South should be paid in full for their
slaves; that he had never supposed that the question would
come up for millions of years yet; and that the most he had
said was that, "It may be doubted, if it does not possibly
seem inferable, that perhaps there may be reason to suspect
that at some future time the slaves may be liberated, after
paying to their owners more than they are worth; but I have
no positive opinion as to what may hereafter take place,
and am only sure that, if emancipation ever does take
place, the negroes must pay to their owners far more in
interest on their purchase money than they now pay in
work."
To most of the citizens of Vicksburg this seemed
entirely satisfactory, but there were some dissentients.
Colonel F. E. Green strongly urged patriotic citizens not
to think of such a thing as treating the Principal to a
coat of tar and feathers and Professor Bullhead, of the
leading young men's seminary, wrote to the
Thunderbolt, requesting his respected colleague to
give a categorical answer to the question "whether, when A
B went to the slave-pen and bought a negro, the negro was
or was not his property, morally as well as legally." If
yes, then Professor Bullhead wanted to know what his
learned and respected friend meant by admitting the
possibility of emancipation even some millions of years
hence; and if no, then Professor Bullhead wanted Principal
Brown to tell him why the slaves, before regaining their
freedom, must pay their owners more than they were worth.
And Professor Bullhead closed with some sarcastic
references to transcendental ethics.
Principal Brown did not answer this plain question of
his friend Professor Bullhead, but got rid of him as
quickly as he could, telling him that there was no dispute
between them, since they both insisted on the right of any
citizen to work and whip his own negro, and then luring him
off into a long discussion of transcendental ethics vs.
sublunary ethics. But it was evident that something more
had to be done, and the papers soon contained an
announcement that Principal Brown proposed to forego for a
time the publication of Volumes XXIV and XXV of his great
work on Moral Philosophy, and immediately to bring out
Volume XXVI, containing a chapter on the slavery question,
which he proposed to read to the citizens of Vicksburg at a
public meeting.
The lecture drew a large audience of the first citizens
of Vicksburg. There was also a sprinkling of rougher
citizens, some of whom before entering the hall deposited
in a rear lot a long rail that they had brought with them,
and some pails that smelled like tar, with a number of
large but evidently light sacks. However, the lecture was a
great success, and at the close, Principal Brown's hand was
nearly shaken off, and he was escorted to his home by an
enthusiastic and cheering crowd, who vowed that nothing
like such a "demolisher to the nigger-lovers" had ever been
heard in Vicksburg before.
But although the stately periods of the Principal are
occasionally marred by what is evidently a reportorial
tendency to the slang of the time, let me quote from the
papers of the next day, which contained long reports of the
speech, accompanied with glowing encomiums:—
(From the Vicksburg Thunderbolt, June 19,
1859)
The wealth and beauty and fashion of
Vicksburg turned out in full force last evening to listen
to a lecture on the slavery question by our distinguished
townsman, Principal J. D. Brown, the widely honored
writer on moral philosophy. In the audience our reporter
counted thirty-seven colonels, two majors, and thirty-two
judges, besides the pastors of all the leading churches.
It is a great pity, as many of the enthusiastic hearers
said, while congratulating Principal Brown and each other
at the conclusion, that William Lloyd Garrison and
Wendell Phillips themselves could not have been there;
for if their miserable nigger-loving hides could be
penetrated by the solid blocks of learning, the
unanswerable logic, and the mathematical demonstrations
which Principal Brown poured into his audience, they
would have sung exceedingly small; even if they had not
seen the full wickedness of their efforts to rob the
widow and the orphan by interfering with our beneficent
domestic institution.
Much of Principal Brown's lecture it will
be impossible to give to our readers this morning, for
our reporter, not being well versed in moral philosophy,
finds himself unable from his notes to make sense of some
of the more profound passages and is uncertain as to how
some of the authorities cited spell their names. There
was some confusion, too, in the hall when Principal Brown
touched on the subject of transcendental ethics, and said
that he had always held, and always would hold, that in
transcendental ethics all men were pretty much alike. But
Colonel Johnson rose in his place and stilled the
disturbance, asking the audience to keep their coats on
till the Principal got through; and when Principal Brown
explained the transcendental ethics related to the other
side of the moon, while sublunary ethics related to this
side of the moon, there was silence again. It was in the
wind-up, however, that the professor got in his best
work, and roused his audience to the highest pitch of
delight and enthusiasm. He said:—
"There are people who contend that these
negro slaves of the South, after they have paid their
owners in full the compensation due them, ought to be
put back in their native land. But how are we to find
who brought them here? Some were brought in Spanish
vessels, some in Portuguese vessels, some in Dutch,
some in English, and some in American vessels; and
these vessels are all by this time sunk or destroyed,
and their owners and crews are dead, and their
descendants have got mixed. Besides, they only got the
negroes from the barracoons on the African coast. Who
is to tell where the ancestor of each one was taken
from and who took him to the coast? Many of these
slaves bear such names as Brown, Smith, Jones, and
Simpson, names borne by the very men who brought their
progenitors here. Then they have such given names as
Caesar, Hannibal, Dick, Tom, Harry, Ephraim, Alexander,
and Nebuchadnezzar, so that no one can tell from their
names whether they originally came from Africa or
England, Italy, Jerusalem, Greece, or Assyria. And what
have these negroes ever done for freedom? Did any one
ever hear of them expressing any sympathy for the
independence of Greece, or protesting against the
Russian invasion of Hungary, or even contributing for
the conversion of the Jews, or for sending missionaries
to the South Sea Islands, where only man is vile?
Contrariwise, when British tyranny invaded our shores
did not these negroes work just as readily for the
hirelings of King George as they did for their own
patriotic masters who were fighting the battles of
liberty? And today when a nigger runs away, where does
he head for? Does he not make a straight streak for
Canada, a country groaning under the government of an
effete monarchy, and with a full-fledged aristocrat for
governor-general? One would like to know that these
negro slaves, whom it is proposed to send back to their
native land when they have compensated their owners,
have some real love for free institutions, before
thrusting freedom upon them.
"To think that slavery was wrongly
established is natural, and not without warrant in
transcendental ethics. But if we entertain the thought
of rectification, there arises in the first place the
question — who enslaved them? Their owners did
not. They only bought them. These negroes were enslaved
by negroes like themselves, — likely enough by
their own mothers, cousins, and aunts. Now which are
the descendants of the one and which of the other? and
where are they to be found? But supposing that they
could be found, there would still have to be recognized
a transaction which goes far to prevent rectification.
If we are to go back upon the past at all, we must go
back upon the past wholly, and take account of what it
has cost to feed and clothe and keep these negroes
since they have been here.
"I have consulted one of our most eminent
negro traders, a gentleman who has probably bought and
sold more negroes than anyone in the Southwest, and
after a close calculation, he informs me that taking
men, women and children together, and considering the
loss of their labor which their owners have to suffer
in the rearing of children, sickness, and old age, and
the cost of overseers, drivers, patrols, and an
occasional pack of bloodhounds, the average negro costs
the average owner a fraction over $267.57 per annum.
But as I wish to be generous to the negro I have thrown
off the 57 cents and a fraction, and will put their
cost to their masters at only $267 a year.
"Now, the first cargo of negro slaves was
landed in Jamestown, Va., in the year 1620, and the
external slave-trade was abolished in 1808. We may
therefore assume the average time during which each
negro has been in this country as one hundred and fifty
years. Saying nothing whatever about interest, it is
thus clear that each living negro owes to his owner as
the cost of keeping him, $267 a year for one hundred
and fifty years, which, excluding interest, amounts at
the present time to just $40,050. (Great
applause.)"
Here a man in a back seat rose, and in a
decidedly Yankee accent asked Principal Brown if he
included negro babies? The Principal replying in the
affirmative, the intruder began: "How can a negro baby
just born owe any one forty thou —" The rest of the
sentence was lost by the sudden exit of the intruder from
the hall, over the heads of the audience. There was quite
an excitement for a few moments, but Colonel Johnson
again rose and restored order by asking the young men in
the rear not to escort the interrupter farther than the
vacant lot adjoining until the close of the proceedings,
as the audience were intent on enjoying the remainder of
the logical feast which their distinguished townsman was
laying before them. All being quiet again, Principal
Brown resumed:
"Observe that the negroes have not an
equitable claim to themselves in their present
condition—washed, clothed and fed, civilized,
Christianized and taught how to work — but only
to themselves in their primitive wild and uncivilized
condition. Now, what is the relation between the
original 'wild nigger' value of each slave and what
each one of them has received from his owner during one
hundred and fifty years? We know that they were bought
at the barracoons, delivered on board ship at prices
ranging from a half-pound of beads to a bottle of rum
or a Manchester musket, the owners, being at the cost
of transporting them to America, including the heavy
insurance caused by the necessarily great mortality,
items which as you will observe I have not charged
against the existing slaves. My friend the slave
merchant estimates that on an average 15s. 9d. English
money would be a high rate. Let us call it, however, $4
American money. Thus we see that an equitable
rectification would require that each negro in the
South should pay his owner a balance of $40,046! (Loud
and long-continued applause.)
"Now, when in the Western Reserve many
years ago, I drew from transcendental ethics the
corollary that the ownership of a man could not be
equitably alienated from the man himself, and argued
that after the slaves had compensated their owners they
should be freed, I had overlooked the foregoing
considerations. Moreover, I did not clearly see what
would be implied by the giving of compensation for all
that during these one hundred and fifty years it has
cost the owner to keep the slave. While, therefore, I
adhere to the inference originally drawn — that
is to say, as far as transcendental ethics is concerned
— a fuller consideration of the matter has led me
to the conclusion that slavery, subject to the right of
the slave to buy himself on payment to his owner of
what he has cost, say $40,046, should be maintained.
But it may be readily seen that such a transaction
would be a losing one to the slaves themselves, for at
the present market price of negroes, they are not
worth, big and little, more than $1,000 each. And,
whereas I have also said that I really did not know but
that in the course of some millions of years it might
possibly be that the slaves could be allowed their
freedom on paying to their owners full compensation, I
now see, since what is due from them to their masters
is constantly increasing, that with humanity as it now
is, the implied reorganization would become more and
more unprofitable. (Still louder and longer applause,
led by Professor Bullhead, who called for three times
three cheers, which were given with a will, the
audience rising and the ladies waving their
handkerchiefs.)
"I also wish to point out that all this
talk about giving their freedom to the slaves is as
foolish as it is wicked. Since under our laws the slave
himself is the property of the master, the slaves
already have their freedom in the freedom of the
master. Thus the equal freedom of each to do all that
he wills, provided that he interferes not with the
equal freedom of all others, as taught by
transcendental ethics, is already recognized by the
laws of the South, and nothing more remains for us to
do, except to keep abolitionist theories from spreading
in this 'land of the free and home of the brave!' "
The uproarious enthusiasm of the audience
could no longer be restrained, and, led by Professor
Bullhead, who rushed on the stage and embraced Principal
Brown, our best citizens crowded round him. During this
time the wretch who had interrupted the Principal was
tarred and feathered in an adjoining lot, and ridden on a
rail to a levee. Unfortunately all efforts of the police
to discover the perpetrators of this reprehensible
proceeding have failed. It is generally supposed to have
been the work of some negroes who were listening through
the open windows and whose feelings were hurt by the
slight insinuation of the stranger as to the value of
colored infants.
While thus calling attention to the similarity between
Mr. Spencer's philosophic methods and those of Principal
Brown, I do not wish to make any personal comparison
between the two philosophers. Since he was under fear of
tar and feathers, that would be unjust to Principal
Brown.
Previous
chapter • Next
chapter • Table of
Contents
|
To share this page with a friend:
right click, choose "send," and add your
comments.
|
themes:
see_also
|
Red links have not been
visited; .
Green links are pages you've seen
|
|