one man’s rant is not necessarily everyone’s

I got an email from the tech manager at UW who was trying to fill that job I mentioned: he was following up on the post I left and added some background on what the specific challenges were.

And he suggested I drop my resume his way, even though it’s likely he had seen it before. I have been thinking about a new way to present the same old information (borrowing from an idea I saw a week or so ago): rather than break it out into jobs and time served, it might be better to break out projects and specify what needed to be done, what I did, and what I learned in the process. Let the work come to the forefront and let the positions drop into the background.

I apologized for venting spleen on his weblog, but he didn’t take it a rant at all, he said.