Neil Gaiman takes on the idea that
isn’t really enough. I have to agree with the opposition on this one, especially given his example:
Well, twenty years ago, when I was younger, quite poor, had two small children and a mortgage, I quit the best job I’d had to that point — writing for a national UK paper — because I didn’t want to write a front page article that editorial had concocted that was obviously untrue.
There is a big difference between attaching your name to a story in a national newspaper, a story that you know to be untrue, and defending a children’s book in your local library. One of those could cost you your current job, the other could cost you your career, in addition to any legal remedies that might result.
While I agree in principle that there is a special obligation I can’t argue with someone who doesn’t want to sacrifice their job to it over this.