so being socially progressive and having a robust economy aren’t mutually exclusive?

A Fistful of Euros:

“Or, to summarise, social spending is good for personal productivity, and democracy is effective in ensuring that real-world governments avoid the costly mistakes that anti-welfare theorists assume. Apart from illustrating the dangers of hand-waving economic arguments, this tells us that the choice between a European-style high-welfare state, and a US-style low-welfare state, has nothing to do with promoting economic growth and is simply a matter of which kind of society we find more pleasant to live in.”

Which would you prefer?

See more here and here.

[Posted with ecto]