anyone got localfeeds working?

Localfeeds.com

Localfeeds is a new kind of wire service. Sources and headlines are discovered automatically, and organized geographically. What are people writing within 30 miles of you? within 50 miles of Toronto? within 20 miles of your favorite blog?

But since it chokes on the ICBM metatags that GeoURL uses, I can’t get it installed. What I have in place (and blessed by GeoURL) is this:

<meta name="ICBM" content="47.688123,-122.29798" />

The ICBM metatag they want me to use looks like this (derived from my ZIP code):
<meta name="ICBM" content="47.432251,-121.803388">

And the parser at LocalFeeds doesn’t like the one supplied by LocalFeeds . . . . .

beware of geeks bearing gifts

TIME Magazine: Coolest Inventions 2003, Apple Music Store

Jobs has one more reason not to be concerned about the competition. “The dirty little secret of all this is there’s no way to make money on these stores,” he says. For every 99¢ Apple gets from your credit card, 65¢ goes straight to the music label. Another quarter or so gets eaten up by distribution costs. At most, Jobs is left with a dime per track, so even $500 million in annual sales would add up to a paltry $50 million profit. Why even bother? “Because we’re selling iPods,” Jobs says, grinning.

A Trojan Horse, indeed . . . .

what is information, exactly?

remembering rebecca: 11.03

Among their jaw-dropping findings: the amount of new information stored on paper, film, magnetic and optical media has roughly doubled in the last three years. Five exabytes of new information — roughly five billion gigabytes — was created in 2002 alone. How big are five exabytes? Imagine half a million libraries as big as the Library of Congress print collections, and you’re on the right track. Each year almost 800 MB of recorded information is produced per person. If stored on paper, that would take about 30 feet of books. But 92% of all that new information is stored on magnetic media, mostly hard disks, rather than on paper, film or optical media.

The cited work is here.

I have a quibble with the use of “information” when I see claims like this. In an old analogy (circa 1996) that I still think holds up, I defined data as oil in the ground and information as gas at the pump. Information informs as a result of having been refined.

And of course the other issue I take with this is with the notion that any of this information is created: I suspect a lot of it is replicated. In the digital age, taking copies of stuff is easy, and I would wager than a lot of the bulging hard drives cited are littered with copies of material created and archived elsewhere.

Perhaps I am misreading this: I don’t know if the study is find that individuals are creating 800 Mb of stuff each year or if stuff is being created on their behalf, on the order of 800 Mb.

It strikes me, from personal experience, that much of the paper usage cited is not for original works but such embarrassments as printed email and copies of presentations that, while created for the screen, are printed in paper.

the enemy of my enemy

News Analysis: Attacks in Saudi Arabia Aim to Rattle a Dynasty

“I think they are after the royal family,” said Wyche Fowler Jr., a former senator who was ambassador to Saudi Arabia from October 1997 to February 2001. “There is a determined fight to rattle the government if not bring it down.”

A prominent Saudi who advises the royal household agreed. “This is an effort to destabilize the regime,” he said. “It’s against the monarchy and it is against the government.”

With domestic rumblings to reduce US dependence on oil imports — read: Saudi Arabia — and increased opposition, even violence, against the regime, what will it take to force a hard look at this relationship? Regime change at home seems like a prerequisite, since the incumbent never met a resource extraction industry he didn’t like. But what then?

It could be argued that the US has common cause with Osama bin Laden and Al Queda, in wanting the House of Saud to use its considerable wealth for good, rather than evil, but for different definitions of good and evil.

dare I read too much into this?

Troy & Gay

But even more interesting, the Republican National Committee web site runs Microsoft software and the Democratic National Committee web site runs Apache on Linux and the difference in reliability (measured in how often the site needs to be rebooted) is striking: 4.26 days for the RNC and 445 days for the DNC. What I’d really like to know is how much money each spent on their sites so we can have a price/performance ratio of Republicans versus Democrats.

Which is the party of stability again?

the last word

I got an email from the Subordinate Professor today, and I had to delete it after one reading: it was too painful. Not so much for me but there was hurt evident in the message. I got the impression she had read some of the postings chronicling this situation, and was unhappy at her portrayal.

Perhaps I could been more positive and offered suggestions for the future, rather than just venting spleen, but I don’t know, even now, if anything I suggest would be taken in the intended spirit.

To her, then, I offer this advice: Speak the truth, even though your voice shakes. Sitting idly by when you sense an injustice is wrong, no matter the reason, be it apathy, fear, whatever. Apologizing to others that “you have to go along with it” undermines you even further by acknowledging the wrong and admitting your cowardice.

I wanted the whole thing to end sooner — much sooner, like June — and if it became unbearably painful as a result of being extended many months past that, I can only hope there’s a lesson there.

Someong with a thicker skin or who wasn’t seeing the stress showing up in their kids’ behavior might have stuck it out longer. I have the former, but couldn’t tolerate the latter.

What’s next? I don’t quite know.

“resources are finite and spam apparently isn’t”

Blocking of Email From Some Domains

Between January and September of 2003, more than 65 million of more than 155 million messages [42%] were classified as spam. These numbers are only for the primary University mail relays, and do not include virus-infected messages. While the domain blocks will only affect a fraction of this load, they should significantly reduce the burden on both the email relays and the email hosts to which the messages are ultimately delivered.

We realize that this is an imperfect solution, however, resources are finite and spam apparently isn’t.

aaack. Those are amazing numbers ….

the end

My last day. Anticlimactic in some ways. Some suggested I just call in sick, but I had taken some sick days earlier when I was having some foot trouble. Once that was less of a problem, I was OK with trying to finish up as best I could.

The Subordinate Professor was nowhere to be seen. I had heard she was having her dog euthanized and with a baby on the way (4 months or so along) I can only imagine how that felt. The Superior Professor was in and about as clueful as one would expect. She even brought me some work to do: I had to take some course evaluations from a continuing ed program and average the scores for each presenter over four criteria and overall, for 10 presenters. Call it half an hour’s work in Excel, but only if you know how to use such arcane features as AVERAGE(). <sigh> The Superior and Subordinate Professors both want to take a class so they can learn these valuable skills. I can’t recall *not* knowing how to do these things . . . . . Complicated financial models and “what-if” scenarios — the kind of thing that multi-million dollar investments hinge on — these aren’t.

It occurs to me that some people’s idea of “point and click” is to point at a task and click/snap their fingers in impatience while someone else does the work . . . .

I finished that task, cleared off my desk, trashed all my email, put a vacation reply on my that email address, removed my account from my computer, changed the admin password, and called it a day at noon:45. Fielded some email from folks who were responding to my farewell address or were catching up on the last few weeks of weblog entries.

No goodbyes, no “thanks for all your hard work”, no “sorry it didn’t work out,” no nothing.

I’m just glad it’s over.

tapping into the zeitgeist

My farewell address to my workplace was very well received by faculty and staff. I expected the staff to be in agreement with some of my sentiments, but I got some kind words from faculty members I wasn’t aware even knew who I was.

And I have had a couple of folks hoping that the circumstances around my departure, indeed my leaving at all in less than a year, will serve as some kind of catalyst for change. I’m not going to indulge in anything quite that messianic, since I was hardly in a core department nor was this all that big a deal, in the grand scheme of things. I think the fact I was located at the periphery had a lot to do with the lack of structure and process in my situation.

It’s not like there’s a peasant’s revolt looming, but I wonder if this should pass unremarked? Is there something an administration committed to change could point to as the kind of behavior or institutional practice that can’t go on?