user agent of the day

Google Search: “Microsoft URL Control”

Microsoft URL Control 6.00.8169: what is it? and what does it want?

Early reports suggest it’s either hunting out unsecured formmail.cgi scripts (circa 1995) or looking for unsecured mail relays.

The version number (if that’s what it is) makes me wonder if it’s part of IE 6, remembering the offline browser feature that was in IE4 and the associated consternation it created.

RSS coming of age?

Usage Statistics for blue.paulbeard.org – September 2002

5 of the top 20 search queries I get are for CNN’s RSS feed (which of course is not provided by CNN): it’s the number 1 query with 4 more appearances in the 11 – 20 spots.

I wonder how many people are starting to browse their news this way and linking to it from an aggregator, rather than the home page of a site? And how will news organizations respond? Will they generate weak RSS files to discourage this (leading more third parties to roll their own) or will they find a way to leverage this new entry point? It’s akin to the argument over deep linking, though the site provides the links. One scenario is that pages read per user may go up as people scan the feed before going to the site: usage, defined as casual browsing, may decline, in favor of more focused reading. Never will good headlines and solid lead paragraphs (‘nut grafs’, as I recall them) be so important.

good news or bad news?

Suspected Computer-Virus Author Arrested

T0rn, with a zero, was not as menacing as the Code Red, Sircam and Nimda worms and viruses, which caused hundreds of millions of dollars in damage to corporate computer networks last year. Linux-based software systems account for a small segment of the computing market.

So does this mean that more people should use Linux since there are fewer viruses that exploit or are we lucky so few people do because the effects might have been worse?

According to this page, t0rn is a rootkit installed by the Lion or Ramen virues and exploits 8.2, 8.2-P1, 8.2.2-Px, and all 8.2.3 beta versions of BIND

so long no one proposes “Physics for Cartoons”

oreilly.com — Online Catalog: Physics for Game Developers

Colliding billiard balls. Missile trajectories. Cornering dynamics in speeding cars. By applying the laws of physics, you can realistically model nearly everything in games that bounces around, flies, rolls, slides, or isn’t sitting still, to create compelling, believable content for computer games, simulations, and animation. Physics for Game Developers serves as the starting point for enriching games with physics-based realism.

Internet English?

Nu Shortcuts in School R 2 Much 4 Teachers

Melanie Weaver was stunned by some of the term papers she received from a 10th-grade class she recently taught as part of an internship. “They would be trying to make a point in a paper, they would put a smiley face in the end,” said Ms. Weaver, who teaches at Alvernia College in Reading, Pa. “If they were presenting an argument and they needed to present an opposite view, they would put a frown.”

A real remedy for the DoJ vs MSFT case

IP: Norway dumps Microsoft

I found this article on the Interesting People mailing list’s archives: required reading if you want to know what’s really being talked about/acted upon.

Often the lynchpin is a standardised file format policy — so you can buy whatever you want, so long as it is 100 per cent Microsoft file format compatible, which is all but impossible as Microsoft changes its formats so often and for no real purpose other than to lock in customers.

Isn’t file compatibility the chief gripe most people have with trying to work with MSFT applications? Between locking non-Windows licensees out and locking its own customers in, there’s a lot to put up with.

Here’s a note on Tim O’Reilly’s weblog to the same effect: Forcing Microsoft to open the office file formats would have done more to encourage competition than just about anyone else. It would be nice to see users’ data belong to them again, with the power to switch to other applications if they so choose.

Users owning their data? What a radical concept. He has a link to a story at the Register on Sun’s XML/open standards initiative.

overdone but amusing all the same

O’Reilly Network: More on MS Mac FUD [September 18, 2002]

An excerpt from one of a few emails Tim O’Reilly shared on his weblog.

. . . . you can basically sum up Microsoft’s position as “our software strategy is screwed, our vendors hate us, our developers aren’t buying in, and the Mac guys have gotten their act together again”.

Other notes: http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/wlg/1743 and http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/wlg/1710

Linux-Windows TCO contest ‘a wash’ for now

searchWindowsManageability.com: The Windows Manageability Specific Search Engine presented by TechTarget.com

I wasn’t sure what I would find here: I suspected it might reinforce my thinking that for J Q Public, it all comes down to applications and Windows clearly owns the corporate desktop right now.

But claiming Windows has an edge in scalability, file systems, and security seems a stretch.

“We’re still working with our partner in this, and we’re not ready to say who that is,” Peter Houston, Microsoft’s Windows platform senior director, told TechTarget on the LinuxWorld floor, where Microsoft had its first LinuxWorld booth. “We’re finding there’s a slight margin in TCO for Linux in very simple Web serving [and] for Windows in super-Web serving, things like hosting environments, that don’t have anything to do with Web-centric applications. There’s a larger [Windows] advantage … in file systems, network infrastructure and security infrastructure.”

from <http://www.oreillynet.com/weblogs/author/36>