this is an idea worth pursuing

News Aggregator for Weblogs At Harvard

This is an experiment. I’ve wanted to try this out for quite some time — it’s a mini-aggregator in a Manila site. A managing editor selects feeds for a news page for his or her community. This means that people can learn about and enjoy a news aggregator without having to install and run one on their own. When they want to control their own subscriptions, then they can advance to the next level. The display of the aggregator here is still quite crude. But there will be new stories at the top of the hour. I have to provide a way to see what we’re subscribed to and a prefs page to add or remove feeds, and to determine how many are displayed on this page. In other words the development is far from finished. But it works. DW

who said the browser war was over?

Mozilla upstart looks up to Safari | CNET News.com

“If you don’t like IE because you have religious issues with Microsoft, you think Netscape/Mozilla is too bloated and you object to paying for Opera, this might be for you,” said Michael Gartenberg, an analyst with Jupiter Research. “But that’s a pretty small marketplace.”

Four rendering engines, and an increasing number of browsers: sounds good to me.

an insider’s parting advice

Microsoft and the Commoditization of Software

Linux is certainly a threat to Microsoft’s less-than-perfect server software right now (and to its desktop in the not-too-distant future), but open source software in general, running especially on the Windows operating system, is a much bigger threat. As the quality of this software improves, there will be less and less reason to pay for core software-only assets that have become stylized categories over the years: Microsoft sells OFFICE (the suite) while people may only need a small part of Word or a bit of Access. Microsoft sells WINDOWS (the platform) but a small org might just need a website, or a fileserver. It no longer fits Microsoft’s business model to have many individual offerings and to innovate with new application software. Unfortunately, this is exactly where free software excels and is making inroads. One-size-fits-all, one-app-is-all-you-need, one-api-and-damn-the-torpedoes has turned out to be an imperfect strategy for the long haul.

Some insight here. And it’s entirely likely they can make the changes he suggests . . . if they want to.

More like this

Ben Hammersley.com: Latent Semantic Indexing in the Guardian

Search sucks. No matter how clever your search engine’s system is, no matter how many clever page-ranking formulae you apply, or how many super-speedy processors you throw at it, the current way to search the internet doesn’t work very well.

Searching by a keyword misses out a boatload of stuff, for one simple reason: many of the documents you might find useful do not contain the keyword. Consider this: you want to find documents on Iraqi politics. You’re a leader writer, perhaps, and one sherry too far gone. You turn to Google, and what do you search for? “Iraqi politics”? “Saddam Hussein?” “Abd al-Rahman Arif”? Well, yes, all of these – and each one will be useful, but not the entire picture. You want the search to return not just the keyword hits, but documents on the same topic that don’t necessarily mention the keyword.

Here is the conference blurb on a presentation about LSI.

Latent semantic indexing (LSI) is an information retrieval technique known to substantially improve recall in full-text search engines. LSI works by applying a dimensionality reduction technique called singular value decomposition (SVD) to a vector space data model, reducing noise and bringing out latent relationships within the data. While most of the research on LSI has been done in the domain of text searches, where LSI search engines can actually retrieve relevant documents that do not match any keyword in a query, the linear algebra implementation of the technique makes it applicable to a wide range of problems in bioinformatics, including gene and protein sequencing, gene regulatory networks, and medical imaging. Many of these potential applications remain completely unexplored.

This idea, though we never called it LSI, was the core of the startup I moved out to Seattle three years ago for.

weblogging as social networking

Power laws and priorities [dive into mark]

[ . . . . ] does that mean that blogging is pointless? Well yes, if what you’re after is fame and fortune. Those 3 hits a day are almost certainly not going to balloon into 3000 or 3 million. And even if you combine all the 3-hit sites together, they won’t ever move markets like The New York Times. On the other hand, those 3 hits are the most important thing in the world, because they’re real people.

Since I was pondering traffic numbers earlier, this resonated. I’ve never gotten a thin dime as a result of my Amazon alms bowl, though I have gotten about $10 in associate fees, but I do this because people read it, no matter if it’s friends I know or ones I haven’t met. I learn from them/you and sometimes people take something away from here.

That seems to be worth doing, even for only 25,000 hits a month.

the future is now?

LILEKS (James) The Bleat

We’re not wearing one-piece jumpsuits and taking meals from a pill-dispensing machines, or flying off to work on jetpacks. We have the stuff that counts. We have computers and communicators; we have a global information network, a space station, robot war machines, cybernetic implants. And we still wear jeans and eat hamburgers, and Elvis had a number one song in Airstrip One last year.

The very idea of the future is undergoing a renovation – it’s not a city on the other side of a wall. The best lesson may be this: there is no wall. In the end the very idea of “The Future” may turn out to be a 20th century conceit, the reason the globe churned itself up fighting one rancid conception of utopia after the other. The future is back to being what it always was: an accumulation of tomorrows, not a wholesale refutation of today.

Sometimes Lileks cuts loose with something approaching profound. Click through and read the whole thing . . . more good stuff awaits.

who says there are no new ideas?

In Praise of the Purple Cow

How, then, does an elevator company compete?
[ . . . ]


Every elevator ride is basically a local one. The elevator stops 5, 10, 15 times on the way to your floor. This is a hassle for you, but it’s a huge, expensive problem for the building. While your elevator is busy stopping at every floor, the folks in the lobby are getting more and more frustrated.

[ . . . ]

Otis’s insight? When you approach the elevators, you key in your floor on a centralized control panel. In return, the panel tells you which elevator is going to take you to your floor. With this simple presort, Otis has managed to turn every elevator into an express. Your elevator takes you immediately to the 12th floor and races back to the lobby. This means that buildings can be taller, they need fewer elevators for a given density of people, the wait is shorter, and the building can use precious space for people rather than for elevators. A huge win, implemented at a remarkably low cost.

FUD about blogging

Working in a University environment is a different business, as I’m realizing. Someone said to me that mentioning that I read Lessig’s blog is bad, since he’s the competition. OK so let’s compete with him.

Doesn’t every successful player scrutinize their opponents? Do football players watch game films? Didn’t Toyota learn how to build the Lexus models by taking apart Mercedes-Benzes? Does MSFT not watch what it’s competitors are doing?

An odd feeling, to be sure. I won’t waste a lot of time pushing that idea.

Of course, it helps to remember that I’ve also heard academia called “the last bastion of socialism.”

quotable

“It especially annoys me when racists are accused of ‘discrimination.’ The ability to discriminate is a precious faculty; by judging all members of one ‘race’ to be the same, the racist precisely shows himself to be incapable of discrimination.”


Letters to a Young Contrarian