noted

dispatches: Mimicking the look of silver:

One of the problems I have with digital output from film is the chalky look from a scanned image. In making my silver prints I use a cold light head on my enlarger, which gives a soft, creamy look to the highlights. It is extremely forgiving to grain. When I see an image from a scanned negative, either from a drum scan or from my Nikon 9000, it looks like a print made with a condensor head enlarger. The grain is hard and granular. The highlights are contrasty and blocked up.

But I think I’ve figured out a way to get that creamy cold-light look.

I just got a flatbed scanner — lacking a power cable, sadly — so I’ll taking a look at this.

stepping boldly into the past

I was poking around in The Guess Where Seattle Pool on Flickr — submitted an image I’ve posted here that people will recognize quickly — and some of the shots were taken with one of these.

 Images P B000Cbor88.01-A1Py46Im1Cbeg3. Sclzzzzzzz

Apparently, this is a very close approximation of the legendary (and heart-stoppingly expensive) Leica M rangefinder. Costs less than a 10th as much, however. The benefits of the rangefinder (you don’t compose through the lens but through the small window at top right) are mechanical simplicity and bulk since you lose the flip-up mirror and accompanying pentaprism.

This makes it smaller than an SLR and quieter, allowing the camera to be insinuated closer to its subjects. It’s long been a staple of the masters of the small camera (cf Magnum).

I can almost feel one of these in my hand, it seems so well-designed (even if it’s not an original design). A camera with immediacy of digital and simplicity of a well-designed rangefinder would be a fine thing. Apparently Epson agrees, but at a Leica-style price. Made with some help from the company that makes the Bessa . . . interesting.

the art of not asking

Gary gets his knuckles rapped for calling attention to his AdSense real estate:

it does seem that I’d let myself slip into some sort of google-ads purgatory:

Publishers are not permitted to encourage users to click on Google ads or bring excessive attention to ad units. For example, your site cannot contain phrases such as “click the ads,” “support our sponsors,” “visit these recommended links,” or other similar language that could apply to the Google ads on your site. Publishers may not use symbols or misleading images that direct attention to the ads on their sites, and publishers may not label the Google ads with text other than “sponsored links” or “advertisements.” [ AdSense Policy ]

That tagline I had over mine — 5¢/day — represents just how much revenue I see from this program, based on its performance from January 1 to the present. What remains obvious — and non-remunerative — to me is how hard it is for the dark satanic mill that is Google AdSense to find ads that fit. You’d think a post with words like focus, vignette, or Holga would pull up some photography-related ads. Checked it again: now it’s down to 4¢. I’m taking it off just so I don’t get annoyed when I see it.

/me tests this out as a keyword search.

Would you believe the ad space at Google is blank for those three words? Holga as a search query pulls a sponsored link for FreeStyle, since they sell them. I guess I am all about non-commercial content. Go, me.

So I can’t actually ask/suggest/importune that anyone click on those ads: they’re just supposed to be compelling enough on their own merits.

hmm

Quite a few references to the “22 panels that always work” over the past couple of days. Looking them over, you know you’ve seen them.

Amygdala:

WALLY WOOD’S 22 PANELS THAT ALWAYS WORK. A cheat sheet from the great comic book/strip artist, Wally Wood.

Story of how Larry Hama, one of Wood’s eight billion assistants over the decades, created the original. Via Mark Evanier.

I’d like to see someone do some pages just using these panels.

Actually, the fun would be to combine Scott McCloud’s 24 hour comic challenge with these. Interestingly, you almost have a 1:1 correspondence if you wanted to use them all. But at the very least, you would have some nice idiomatic stuff to lean on.

Continue reading “hmm”

empty

Summer Holga explorations

Originally uploaded by paulbeard.

I keep looking at this picture. Can’t make up my mind if it’s something I need to re-visit, or if I like it as it is. I like the vignetting, how it focuses the attention on the empty bench. Also like the repetition of those verticals: that’s what drew my eye at first. Is there an empty bench behind each one of them? Is it turtles all the way down?

Just for grins, I’ll edit this to add some more keyword fodder. I’m not gaming the system, am I?

I used Kodak T400CN C41 B&W film in a Holga 120.

more late night musical(?) fun

Another run through GarageBand. The mini really struggles with it. Trying to lay down a second track just gives it fits. The monitor cuts out, which makes it even less musically enriching.

Worked through the Buzz Feiten tuning methods and reached the conclusion this beast has a really bad intonation problem. Old strings are not helping, to be sure, but I think the fix is more than $5 away.

Messy run through but I was making it up as I went and then forgetting it as I wrestled with recalcitrant equipment.

further adventures with the single use camera

Well, as a proof of concept, it’s a go. But soldering those itty bitty connectors is not. I’ll tell the youngsters to go ahead and use the cameras and I’ll get the pictures out one way or another.

The smart move seems to be to get a Palm m100 Hotsync cable and hack it to fit. The connector fits into the camera’s USB port and you easily rewire the other end with the USB connector of your choice. So I’m looking into that now. Dollar stores are allegedly good places to find these, but eBay and Amazon have them as well, at 99¢.

you know, this isn’t a joke

This iTunes playlist has some pretty good stuff on it, despite the name.

This, for example. Or this. This was the first song I was ever taught to play. Oh, now this is a more representative Air Guitar track. I may have to look through this and see what other odds and ends I can find.

(and no, I don’t get any credit if you order these. can’t be bothered to wrestle with their affiliate mumbo-jumbo. Live it up . . . )

Now playing: Over Under Sideways Down by Jeff Beck from the album “Beckology (Disc 1)” | Get it

yet another “we shoulda let ’em secede” rant

The proprietor of Orcinus has a guest host in and she dug up an old piece of her own as conversation starter:

It’s occured to me that we might have actually been a lot farther ahead now as a nation if the South had won the Civil War. They could have gone their own way, and let the modern world pass them by…at least, for a while. Very likely, within a generation or two, they would have decided for themselves that liberal democracy might be a good idea after all, and made that transition on their own time, in their own way. By now, they probably would have been just another friendly North American country, like Canada.

But losing the war short-circuited their economic and cultural development. Rather than join the modern world, they became like an abused child who never matures beyond the developmental stage at which the abuse occured. They got stuck in their own victimization and anger, and stayed there. The ever-present opportunity to blame them damn Yankees for everything allowed them to avoid taking any responsibility for their own social progress (or lack thereof). If they were on their own as a country, there would be nobody left to blame, no “tradition” to mourn, no cherished shreds of lost glory to fetishize. Their fate would have been truly their own.

Instead, the bitterness of defeat festered, then metastasized. It got channeled into Jim Crow, fundamentalism, hyperpatriotism, and a crazy dark take-no-prisoners militancy. These are distinctively Southern cultural traits, though they’ve put out some long tendrils that now sprout up wherever rural Americans are in distress. Those people may be Bush’s base, but their very existence is the result of a serious and long-standing pathology in our body politic. In winning the Civil War, we doomed ourselves to an eternal Culture War — which is simply the Civil War still being fought by other means.

Maybe it’s not too late. Maybe we should just jettison the South, and give it the freedom to become the country it so desperately thinks it wants to be. Leave the borders open for, say, 20 years, so that those who want to leave the South can move to the US, and those who share the ideals of the new Confederacy can freely emigrate there. If they want to reinstate Jim Crow, install the death penalty for women who seek abortions, and give civil rights only to propertied white born-again men, I think they should have that right….as well as the right to bear the full brunt of the consequences those choices will inevitably bring.

History suggests that the descent into Third World status would be sharp and fast. And this time, they’d have no one to blame but themselves. The resulting disaster would, finally, discredit their worldview as utterly and completely as the fall of the Berlin Wall spelled the end of Communism. At some point, they’d eventually decide that some of those liberal values aren’t so bad after all (especially if they bring the investors back) — and that it’s finally time to join the 20th Century.

That’s my current fantasy, anyway. Let them finally go through the transformation to a modern state on their own. The alternative — which we appear to heading for — is for them to take over the whole country, drag us all back to the place they got stuck (about 1880 or so), and force the rest of us to go through the last century all over again with them, so they can finally learn the hard historical lessons the North and West already figured out the first time around.

I wonder. Would the CSA ever have been prepared to relinquish sovereignty and rejoin the Union? By 1900, would both countries have simply evolved to be neighborly but not close?

As usual when this comes, I have to recommend the Nine Nations of North America as a way of looking at this. There are some natural divisions within the country as it is, based on geography and demography/ethnicity. The south is no more monolithic that the nation as a whole. Florida is not a southern state, as anyone who has lived there knows, no more anymore than Texas is. Garreau’s book offers a more granular breakdown and I think it still holds up pretty well, 25 years on.