death (or at least indigestion) to spammers!!!!

Anti-Spam!

What’s This Page For?

The purpose of this page is to make it so that spammers who attempt to collect email addresses off the web through programs will not have real email addresses in their database, causing them trouble because they will have to clean out their list. This page has one hundred randomly generated email addresses (reload and new ones will appear). At the bottom of the page is a link to this page again, essentially reloading it for programs to collect more fake email addresses. Email collecting programs will be sent in an infinite loop by following the link at the bottom of the page and will get more and more fake email addresses stuck in their databases. This helps to place many invalid email addresses that won’t help spammers (they will get more returned email 😉 and is our effort to FIGHT SPAM.

Fight Spam! Click Here!

whose classroom is it, anyway?

These “computers in education” posts almost merit their own category.

Professors Vie With Web for Class’s Attention

“When you see 25 percent of the screens playing solitaire, besides its being distracting, you feel like a sucker for paying attention,” Professor Ayres said.

Unless law students are fully engaged in the class, he said, they miss out on the give and take of ideas in class discussion and do not develop the critical thinking skills that emerge from “deeply tearing apart a case.”
[ . . . . ]
Professor Ayres tried to prohibit all Internet use in his classroom. The students “went ballistic,” he said, and insisted that their multitasking ways made them more productive and even more alert in class.

So let them go ballistic. They pay their fees for an education, not to be permitted to waste people’s time.

It would be interesting to see the relationship between in-class surfing and grades.
Continue reading “whose classroom is it, anyway?”

the browser war simmers

SPLF: Browser Support

This web site is designed for Microsoft Internet Explorer 4.x and above and Netscape Navigator/Communicator 4.7 and above on a PC and Microsoft Internet Explorer 4.5 and above and Netscape Navigator/Communicator 4.7 and above on the Apple Macintosh.

Other browsers may work fine but are not recommended or supported.

But you never get a chance to see how well supported a browser is: if you try to use anything but one of the ones mentioned, you get this polite but frustrating page. And the supported browsers are 5 years old: an eternity in the internet age.

Of course, Galeon will permit you to change your user agent string. So I just impersonated Mozilla circa 1997 and got right in.

Nothing looked amiss nor did Galeon fail to render anything correctly. It’s a nice looking site, and from all accounts, would benefit from a wider audience: beats me why they want to keep people out of it.

technology in the classroom: help or hindrance?

BBC NEWS | Programmes | Analysis | Mr Chips or Microchips?

Computers have been hailed as the transformers of education, a dazzling technology that changes the whole nature of learning, reduces the burdens on teachers and equips everyone for the modern economy.

Yet disturbing evidence is emerging that computers may harm, rather than help, educational progress. There is still much debate among even the most enthusiastic supporters of high technology about how computers can best be used.

Interesting story here from the BBC. Thanks to Wade who saw it on slashdot.

The most insightful quote comes from the reporter, Frances Craincross:
After all, girls in Britain
increasingly outshine boys in core subjects such as English. So
might more time at the keyboard improve boys� performance? Or
might it be that girls do well because the use of computers brings
few benefits to most pupils?

That’s a really good question: is there a difference between how boys and girls learn that can be attributed to time spend at the keyboard?

My two younger learners got LeapPads this christmas, and I think these are as appropriate a technology as you can find for kids that young (4 and 5).

It’s a folding plastic shell that holds a paper workbook and a rechargeable cartridge that explains and drills the user based on the page being displayed. Some pages are to be written on (the book is laminated) and other are just used as a touchscreen: there is an attached stylus.

What’s missing from this is an operating system, a keyboard, and a display: in other words, it’s not a computer (though the kids call them computers). It’s expandable: simply add a new paper book and cartridge and work with different or more advance subject matter.

What I like most about them is that they’re engaging enough for kids to like them and as as result the hardest part of learning — drilling and repetition — becomes much mess painful.

And for less than $40, it’s hard to beat.

“I’m young, I’m rich and I can do it.”

Glass Panes and Software: Windows Name Is Challenged

The single person most responsible for Microsoft’s selecting the name Windows, according to court documents, was Rowland Hanson, a marketer who came from Neutrogena, the soap and cosmetics maker. Until Mr. Hanson arrived in May 1983, the new software was called Interface Manager, which the programmers liked.

Understandably, Mr. Hanson scrambled for an alternative. He had scant knowledge of computers at the time. “I recall that windowing or something like that had been used by somebody,” Mr. Hanson said in deposition testimony, “and that’s what triggered me to think about it as windows. . . . I looked at our product, and ours was clearly, had windows on the screen.”

So Microsoft Windows it was.

So the name was no more carefully thought-out than the product itself . . . . .

Actually, not to toss rotten tomatoes at the usual target, I’m amused that Michael Robertson is doing this. I don’t know that it’s unfair to call him a “serial opportunist” as MSFT has done: but so what? It’s not as if what Mr Gate’s team hasn’t aped what they couldn’t come up with on their own.

I would never have guessed MP3.com would end up making anyone $372 million dollars. If that gives him the wherewithal to stay in the game longer than Be, I say good for him.