this looks interesting

Jarrett House North :

Hello to my 10 subscribers

Dave has been steadily rolling out new features in his OPML aggregation site, feeds.scripting.com

but where it falls down for me is that I only read this site as part of a meta-feed, so JHN would never show up in my OPML file unless I add it by itself.

I don’t get anything through the direct feed that I don’t get through the meta-feed, so they are chasing the same readers. The moral seems to be, you may have more subscribers than you can count reliably. That’s not a bad outcome.

ecto, for everyone

ecto beta version 0.1.6 is now available for download.This version will expire at the end of January, 2004. This is the first public release of ecto.

now playing: Radio Paradise DJ-mixed Modern & Classic Rock, World Beat & more

I’ve used all the betas (there were only 5 prior to this public release) and it’s been quite solid all the way. This version has some nice new icons, as well.

The wins for me?

  • not having to use a browser to edit posts: ecto is quicker at posting changes the xml-rpc interface
  • the custom tags (see example at the bottom and think of how many you can come up with)
  • it’s a real OS X app: access to it through the Services menu works fine as does stuff like spellcheck
  • and of course, it’s well thought-out, building on the success of Kung Log and extending it to do more without bloat

Go get your copy.

[Posted with ecto]

a peek at Apple’s video device strategy?

David Pogue’s Circuits email this week details an interview with Steve Jobs: one of the topics discussed was video players, of some undetermined form . . . .

But Mr. Jobs outlined three reasons he doubted video players would ever approach the success of audio players — not even counting their high price ($700 and up) and the time-consuming difficulty of loading huge video files onto them. It was clear from his answers that Mr. Jobs has done quite a bit of thinking about the topic.

First, he said, on a video player, “there’s just no equivalent of headphones.” That is, when you put on headphones and press Play on a music player, the results are spectacular &emdash; you get a very close equivalent to the concert-hall experience.

But watching video on a tiny three-inch handheld screen is almost nothing like the experience of watching a movie in a theater or even on TV. It can’t approach the same realism or emotional impact.

Second, he pointed out that Hollywood has been a much better job of providing outlets for its wares than the recording industry. If you want to see a movie, you can see it in the theater, on DVD, on pay-per-view, on HBO, in flight and so on.

On the other hand, Mr. Jobs pointed out that until recently, there was pretty much only one legal way to buy music: go to a store and bring home a CD or tape. The debut of legitimate download services like Apple’s iTunes store was a huge factor in the popularity of portable music players — but there just isn’t the same kind of pent-up demand for new movie-buying channels.

Finally, Mr. Jobs noted, people just don’t consume music and movies the same way. You might listen to a certain song dozens or hundreds of times in your lifetime. But how many times in your life do you watch a movie? Most people probably wouldn’t watch even their favorite movies 10 times in their lives, and therefore don’t buy nearly as many movies as they do songs or CD’s.

[ . . . ]

“Now, I’m not saying we’re not working on something like that,” Mr. Jobs added. “Who knows what we’ve got in our labs?”

Movies are an immersive experience: as noted above, you don’t watch a movie while you do homework or jog (at least not productively or safely). Unless some other kind of content in factored into this (something that isn’t affected by screen size like a movie would be and that doesn’t require a 90 minute investment), I’m not sure what’s a-brewing. A TiVo player you carry around, perhaps? Sync it up with your PVR and take your programming to go, along with your music . . . . .

There’s the obvious tease there, between what he says about their labs and the widely-discussed job posting for a video engineer with experience in consumer electronics . . . something’s up at Infinite Loop.

[Posted with ecto]

mini-iPod skeptics pop up

BW Online | January 7, 2004 | A maxiPrice for Apple’s miniPod

Yeah, I can see the argument here:

Here are the hard numbers. The new miniPod will cost $249. That’s about $100 more than the rumor sites had posited. It will offer 4 gigabytes of capacity on its hard drive. By comparison, the entry-level iPod now costs $299 and has 15 gigabytes of disk space. The miniPod’s cost per gigabyte is $62.50. In the entry-level iPod, it’s about $20.

So Apple is asking customers to pay three times as much per gigabyte. I have one word for that. Ouch.

But again, with Apple products, design — both look-and-feel and functionality — is the intangible that moves boxes. Not everyone prices the individual components of the stuff they buy and the iPod is more than just the storage it comes with.

The proof of the pudding is in the eating, of course. I’m not sure a *smaller* iPod was what the market was clamoring for, but then if Apple is planning to make video a component of future devices, this may not be the only form factor variation we see.

the rest of us have known this for some time

Daring Fireball: A Big Garage

What’s so cool about GarageBand is that it exemplifies the market that Apple is going after. People who want to use their computers to make cool things. People who want to be producers, not just consumers. If it’s possible to distill into a single thought what it is that makes Apple Apple, and what has made the Macintosh so enduringly popular, that’s it.

That’s why Apple’s industry-wide PC market share numbers are nearly meaningless. The vast majority of Wintel PCs are used as little more than modern-day typewriters. They’re just office equipment.

PC pundits pound their heads against the wall, asking why, if Apple only sells a small percentage of computers, the company receives such a disproportionate amount of media attention. The answer is simply that they’re selling the best computers, to the most interesting people. Maybe it is only two percent of the total PC market, but it’s the most interesting two percent.

I have called PCs “typewriters with TV screens” for years: in my experience, most people use them as a terminal, rather than a computer. You don’t need 1+GHz of CPU to type correspondence or manage email, and the fees associated with meaningless software upgrades (does Office 2000 do a better job of “taking a letter” than Office 97 did?) make it a subscription that has to be maintained, whether you get anything out of it or not.

This should be interesting to follow

Introducing the TPSM

Methodology Here’s how it works: I’ll present a list of major marquee technologies dating back over the past couple of decades, divided into two groups of a half dozen or so each. One group is technology winners (examples: Java and the Personal Computer), the other is the losers (examples: Ada and Interactive TV). Then, I’ll present a list of ten or so factors which might plausibly be useful in predicting the success of new technologies (examples: Investor Support and Technical Elegance).

From there on it’s obvious: you build a matrix of the technology winners and losers and what each potential predictor would have said about them. From this, with any luck, patterns emerge and it becomes obvious which of the predictors are the ones that work.

It will be instructive to see which predictors work in the real world (ie, why was interactive TV considered a clear winner?).

Go? I’m a goner . . .

Play Go on Mac OS X

I decided to learn more about this game, having only heard of it so far. Chess and checkers have become very popular at home, but the rules and strategic implications of chess can be overwhelming for a 6 year old. Checkers is less of a struggle, but lacks variety. Hence, Go . . . .

There is a lot of information about the game, why it’s good, what it purports to reveal, etc. and the OS X implementation is very nice, as far as I can tell. But it’s hard to get a handle on how to play it. The strategy seems, well, vague. Even playing on the 9 x 9 beginners board, I get beaten like a drum everytime . . . . They say that, unlike chess, no computer program can reliably beat a master player. Well, I suppose if the Go equivalent of Deep Blue wants to win badly enough, I can expect knock at my door.

They say practice is how you learn so I can hope for some improvement.

Posted with ecto

isn’t filesharing just a little like radio used to be?

For the Ex-Buccaneer, a Pillage-Free Playlist

Here’s the shocker: more than ever, he began asking us to buy CD’s for him. He wanted discs from artists he had come to know online, with the liner notes and lyrics. His less copyright-friendly buddies send him the stuff they like, and if he likes a song, he listens to a better-quality version on Rhapsody or buys the track.

Amazing but true: music downloading spurs music sales, at least in our house.

So let me see if I understand this: kid listens to music. He hears something he likes. He wants to hear more of the same. He experiments with different artists in the same genre. Then, he buys the recordings. Gee, that sounds a lot like my own experiences with radio before it became so limited.

Wouldn’t it be nice if the RIAA cartel took up a new strategy in this new year?