Ludwig van

Eat up your Beets:

“This, as never before, is Beethoven for free – a gift to the world, just as he might have wished.” From Sunday, the BBC will broadcast Beethoven’s entire musical output over a six-day period, with all nine symphonies offered as free (and DRM-free) MP3 downloads. By doing so, critic Norman Lebrecht argues that the BBC Philharmonic’s cycle may become ‘the household version to computer-literate millions in China, India or Korea who have never heard of Karajan or Klemperer.’ What that might mean for the struggling classical recording industry is anyone’s guess.

Time for some time-shifted recording . . . .

[composed and posted with ecto]

Ooops: no need.

Symphonies 1 & 3 will be broadcast on Monday 6th June, and available to download from Tuesday 7th June to Monday 13th June. 
Symphonies 2, 4 & 5 will be broadcast on Tuesday 7th June, and available to download from Wednesday 8th June to Tuesday 14th June. 
Symphony 6 will be broadcast on Monday 27th June, and available to download from Tuesday 28th June to Monday 4th July. 
Symphony 7 will be broadcast on Tuesday 28th June, and available to download from Wednesday 29th June to Tuesday 5th July.
Symphony 8 will be broadcast on Wednesday 29th June, and available to download from Thursday 30th June to Wednesday 6th July. 
Symphony 9 will be broadcast on Thursday 30th June, and available to download from Friday 1st July to Thursday 7th July.

file under: outboard brain

Automounting under Tiger doesn’t work like it did in earlier releases. So I had to figure out how to do it all over again. Now it seems to work. It required doing it all in NetInfo Manager for now: I couldn’t make the older directions I had used work. I think that may have something to do with my system rebuild: I dimly remember using the flatfiles option (very old school) for these types of things.

This is what I got from nidump -r / / (It’s the moral equivalent of mounting red:/opt/music on /Network/Servers/Music but not as direct.)

    { 
      "name" = ( "mounts" );
      CHILDREN = ( 
        { 
          "name" = ( "red:/opt/music" );
          "dir" = ( "/Network/Servers/Music" );
          "vfstype" = ( "nfs" );
          "opts" = ( "net" );
        }
      ) 
    },    

And it looks like this in NetInfo Manager:

Mount

[composed and posted with ecto]

impossible to summarize

Books Over 200 Pages Considered Harmful To Students:

Leave it to lawmakers to replace one problem with a totally inane and dangerously misguided one. The California Assembly just passed a bill that bans textbooks longer than 200 pages, requiring publishers to shorten their tomes and include — get this — an appendix of related websites. The bill, California AB 756, ostensibly addresses the problem of outdated textbooks while encouraging use of the internet for learning. There are so many things wrong with this bill, it’s hard to know where to begin. Well-meaning as it is, catering to the short attention spans of kids is the most counterproductive thing the state could do. Teachers are complaining all the time they can’t get students to read more books and spend less time online. If the books are long and boring, find better books. Don’t commission shorter boring books. Failing that, maybe they should just go with the best books they can find and understand that education requires a modicum of an attention span. And kids don’t need a soon-to-be-outdated list of websites to encourage web research. On the contrary, they need more guidance on how to use it more judiciously and appropriately. Also, the law defines the books in question as “instructional materials.” Does that include novels? Dictionaries? Reference guides? If this bill does become law, looks like the makers of Cliffs Notes and Reader’s Digest will be pleasantly surprised.

Both my 6 and 8 year old read 300+ page books routinely, and I know of others who can do it as well.

My question: where are the parents in this? Opposed? In favor? Unaware the state assembly is meddling in something like this?

Now playing: Welcome To The Occupation by R.E.M. from the album “Document” | Get it


[composed and posted with
ecto]

the job market: is there one?

Brad Delong pointed this out:

Louis Uchitelle Looks at the Long-Term Unemployed:

Not since World War II has long-term joblessness – the percentage of the unemployed out of work for six months or more – been so high for so long after a recession has ended…. Several factors seem to be contributing to the rise in long-term unemployment. The swelling cost of company-paid health insurance is “inducing business to be less aggressive in its hiring,” said Mark Zand…. The baby boomer bulge working its way through the labor force also plays a role; as this large group of workers ages it becomes harder for some who lose their jobs to find new work suited to their skills….

“It looks like employers are very hesitant about the future of the economy,” said Lawrence F. Katz, a labor economist at Harvard. “It may be that we will fall into another weak economic period before we get a good recovery and really robust hiring.” After World War II, when traditional industries dominated the economy, the usual pattern was for long-term unemployment to surge during recessions and die away quickly as recoveries took hold. That changed during the early 1990’s and is even more evident in the current recovery, which began in November 2001. Rather than subside as growth resumed, long-term unemployment as a share of total joblessness continued to rise, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. It peaked 17 months ago at 23.3 percent and has only gradually tapered off since then, to 21.2 percent in April….

Toyota Motors of North America, whose sales are rising more rapidly than other automakers in the United States, is holding back on hiring although its plants are operating flat-out. Its payroll, said Dennis Cuneo, a senior vice president, has grown by only 600 jobs this year – all of them at newly opened plants – to a total of just over 32,000 employees. Existing factories continue on two shifts a day. Overtime and reconfigured work schedules help to squeeze out more production, without adding third shifts and the hiring that the additional shifts would require. “We are reluctant to bring people on immediately,” Mr. Cuneo said. “We are going to wait and see what we can still get from improvements in productivity. If the demand is sustained, there will come a point where you have to add a shift.”…

Sixty-six percent of the working age population was in the labor force in April, down from 66.7 percent at the start of the recovery. That is 1.6 million missing people, enough to raise the unemployment rate to 6.2 percent from its present 5.2 percent – if they all showed up….

That’s a real problem with unemployment stats: they don’t count everyone.

And it’s hard to look at that penultimate paragraph and think there’s a lot of job growth: there may be productivity gains and increased sales revenue, but that ain’t the same thing.

Some time earlier today, a friend passed this my way:

Mike Davidson: We’re Hiring In a Pretty Big Way:

[T]he Walt Disney Internet Group is looking to fill over 80 positions in our North Hollywood and Seattle offices right now. These are mostly technical positions ranging from the creative side of things to the engineering side of things, and I can tell you from the over four years I’ve worked here that it’s a great place to get your groove on.

To list every position available in this blog entry would take quite some time, but just in the Seattle office, I know we’re looking for engineers, technical producers, designers, managers, Java people, SQL people, project managers, and a handful of other positions.

So perhaps there are some opportunities out there. But it’s hard for me to keep up the pretense I am employable in technology any more: 4 years away is a long time. I think I still understand the business aspects of it all well enough, but the tools and coding landscape has changed more than I care to think about.

And of course, I couldn’t consider anything til September anyway, unless I could bring the kids to work or work from poolside. Ah, well.
Now playing: Prove It by Television from the album “Marquee Moon” | Get it

[composed and posted with ecto]

Bone and genres

I read the one volume edition of Bone yesterday/night; kept me up til 1 AM.


I enjoyed it but I think I overdid it by trying to take it all in at once. I’ll have to go through it again and make sure I get the whole story, as some of it seems to be disjointed in my mind.

I liked the art enormously: I wish I had a glimmer of an idea how to achieve those effects. I see how the pencil and ink strokes go but I could never imagine getting from a blank page to what I see, nor could I do even a rough approximation of it with the book open next to me. (My kids still think I know how to draw, but the day will come when they take a look at what I’ve done and come back with their own version, asking “is this what you meant to do?”)

I read a note on a site I usually find to be pretty sensible dismissing graphic novels as comic books and their fans as immature. I was surprised, especially given the quality of work by someone like Marjane Satrapi[*].

I’ve been dismissive of SF as a genre before and perhaps defending one genre that is similarly ghettoized seems contradictory.

What I’m really opposed to is genres, period. When SF and fantasy are shelved together, what sense does that make? Is Ulysses not a fantasy? But it’s shelved with Literature. China Miéville is likewise in the SF section: I don’t get that at all. Perhaps what’s needed is a section of books that don’t fit anywhere: I’ll start there, when I hit the library, if that happens.

Maybe that’s the pleasure of browsing the graphic book section: there’s no division within that classification. Bone is next to Classics Illustrated which is next to some Eisner books which are next to Love and Rockets.

A pox on anything that keeps readers from finding good books, regardless of what they think they like

.


[composed and posted with
ecto]

Continue reading “Bone and genres”