enneagrams

Out of the Box
I found this while I was looking for something else . . .

When you notice yourself sinking into your self-described “bitter feeling, as if I have been wasting my productive years in the wrong places or aiming at the wrong goals,” say to yourself, “Ah, I am inside a box where I am compulsively focusing on myself as an outsider, a misfit. I have bought into this belief to such an extent that I keep myself from seeing the light outside.” When you observe yourself feeling “disenchanted”, say to yourself, “Ah, I am inside a box again, playing out the belief that the grass must be greener somewhere else.”When you find yourself thinking of yourself as “odd,” say to yourself, “Ah, I’m in a box of focusing on my flaws.” When you find yourself saying, “Oh, God, I’m in this box again, I can’t bear it!” keep observing yourself until you can accept yourself as you [are].

I first looked into this a while back and I haven’t given it much thought since. But it still resonates when I read these pages. It goes a little deeper/further than Myers-Briggs, since it deals with psychological motivations, not just types in a vacuum. As noted, I’m a Four, just like these more well-known folks: Ingmar Bergman, Alan Watts, Sarah McLachlan, Alanis Morrisette, Paul Simon, Jeremy Irons, Patrick Stewart, Joseph Fiennes, Martha Graham, Bob Dylan, Miles Davis, Johnny Depp, Anne Rice, Rudolph Nureyev, J.D. Salinger, Anaîs Nin, Marcel Proust, Maria Callas, Tennessee Williams, Edgar Allan Poe, Annie Lennox, Prince, Michael Jackson, Virginia Woolf, Judy Garland, “Blanche DuBois” (Streetcar Named Desire).

Enneagram

I also found this on a possible link between MBTI and the Enneagram:

Is there a relationship between the nine Enneagram and sixteen MBTI types? If so, how can it best be characterized? In the course of laying the groundwork, in Part 1, for an answer to this question, we review previous hypotheses regarding the nature of the ‘triads’ in Enneagram theory and offer yet another (a ‘fifth’) approach to this crucial material.

be the change you want to see . . . updated

The Doc Searls Weblog : Tuesday, November 5, 2002

Cause your own effects
Got an email from a reader this morning � another polymath with a polyspecialized background, now sidetracked at midlife without any obvious career track. He wanted advice.
I wrote back: Start a blog.
I’ve been giving that advice for quite awhile now. A lot of people on the blogroll to the right are there because they took start-a-blog advice. This very blog was started at Dave’s insistence (advice wasn’t working, so he cranked it up a notch), back in October ’99.
Anyway, I was responding to this guy’s request by email when I decided to cut the last line and paste it over here. You can be the pinball or you can be the pinball machine. With a blog you can create your own machine.

sardine

mozdev.org – sardine: index

sardine allows the Mozilla user to apply customizations to all websites visited. The customizations are done by manipulating the DOM. All elements in the DOM, and all attributes of those elements can be manipulated. Any element can be changed to a different type, or hidden or an attribute removed, changed or added.

This looks interesting.

Possible applications/examples of sardine are:

* Turning off all JavaScript. (Disabling the <script> tag and onclick, etc attributes).
* Turning off all background images. (Disabling the background attribute of <body>).
* Converting blink tags into simple bold tags.
* Show non frame versions of websites. (Disable <frameset> tag).
* An ad filter. (Hide the <img> tag if its src attribute matches a certain regular expression pattern (ie. from a certain host)).

So you could apply your own display and/or security desires/requirements on any or all sites.

open source tithing

open source tithing

Stolen from John
How much time should one contribute toward the development of the open source software they use? The concept of tithing comes to mind. Just contribute 5 or 10 percent of the time that you use open source software (OSS).

Example: Suppose you use OSS every day, all day, to do your work. Now say you work 40 hours a week (stop laughing!). Maybe only half of that time is on the computer (whatever). So we’ve got 20 hours a week of usage. Just an hour or two a week meets your quota. While that doesn’t sound like much, there are a lot of users out there. Multiply!

Two hours a week proofreading or updating documentation, doing some performance tuning and sharing your findings, whatever. Remember, you don’t have to be a coder to help The Cause.