Month: June 2002

Bought a new thermometer for outside and mounted it in the shade, on a wall of the garden shed. Right now, it reads just over 100 degrees. It’s hot (82 is the predicted high), but not quite as bad as all that.

For some reason, the geniuses who keep spam in our daily lives think sending WAV files is more useful that the old standby HTML and ASCII trash.

Fortunately, my mailer doesn’t do anything interesting with it: I just get a blank email, as blank as the mind that sent it. I probably need to create a filter for them: I’m getting a couple a day now . . . .

The Register

The AdTI [Alexis de Tocqueville Institution]’s very weak and poorly-researched paper opens no debate. It simply confirms that Microsoft paid AdTI to come up with something — anything — to stem the growing adoption of open-source (especially GPL’d) software by business and government.

Some things don’t need [my] commentary: you just need to read it. Echoes of Dr. Edgar David Villanueva Nunez’s letter to MSFT.

The questions that come to mind:

Why is MSFT wasting their money on this kind of thing? By calling attention to open source vs their model, aren’t they inviting comparisons that might not otherwise occur?

And if they feel compelled to do this, why not spike something as half-baked as this? I can’t believe anyone read this and thought it was useful.

what are you looking for when you end up here?

I see a lot of search engine referrals indicating people are searching on the word “quotidian.” I’m curious about that. Am I reaping the benefits of choosing an odd word that happens to be the name of a gallery that “specializes in alternative art and new, modern genres from an experimental culture?”

Or is it the theater company with the “goal of producing plays by Anton Chekhov, Horton Foote, and other realistic or impressionistic writers, in the spare, understated style intended by the playwrights. “

The Seattle Times: Business & Technology: Battle brewing over deep linking

“We consider it unfair to base your business upon the works of others,” said Ebbe Dal, the group’s managing director.

There’s some new ballyhoo over the notion of “deep linking” or linking to an article that isn’t necessarily an approved mode of entry to a website. As an example, the link above would be a “deep link.”

So the newspaper publisher’s association thinks anyone who makes a living based on the works of others owes these “others” a payment. Well, what do newspapers do, other than write about the works, good, bad, or indifferent, of others? Simplistic, I’ll concede, but not altogether inaccurate.

This has a couple of very simple remedies. Any news organization that takes this attitude should be ignored by all search engines or indexing services. Once they realize how many of their visitors are coming to read their content discovered by others, perhaps they’ll wise up. If they were remotely clueful they would know that already.

It’s a trivial matter for a website operator to examine how a website visitor arrived at their site. So it would be simple to dynamically serve the content the user is actually looking for with whatever branding, advertising, whathaveyou the visitor avoids by not arriving through the site’s own entry pages.

When someone makes a request made from a webserver, the browser software passes along a lot of identifying information, like the type of browser, the last page visited, the network address, etc.

Click here for yours. The variable HTTP_REFERER is this page you’re reading now (yes, I know REFERER is misspelled: blame the boys at NCSA).

So a clueful website operator could examine these requests and serve content wrapped in whatever is appropriate for that user, depending on where they arrived through the website or from elsewhere.

The real beef is that users come to a site, read an article or two, and then leave. If they find no compelling reason to bookmark a site or otherwise remember it, it’s a lost opportunity. The online publishing game is struggling and rather than address the problem, it’s easier to make the boss think he’s losing money to search engines and indexers than because of outdated business models.